Casinos outside the BetStop register: the choice Australians are really making

Updated September 2026

Licensed

Available in US

Fast payouts

18+ Only

Anyone typing this kind of search into a browser is usually not shopping for a casino. They are looking for a way around something — most often a self-exclusion they set up themselves, or a worry that they are about to. The honest answer is short: no online casino can be licensed in Australia at all, so no online casino can plug into BetStop, and an offshore casino sits in a space the register was never built to reach. The longer answer, which is what this page is for, is what those offshore sites are, what is and is not legal about using one, what regulators have done about the brands that keep showing up in search results, and — most importantly — where someone who is worried about their own play should turn instead of opening another tab.

The data behind this page is current as of 23 September 2026 and was checked against the Australian Communications and Media Authority’s published blocking and warning actions.

The lay of the land: why “not on BetStop” is the default, not the exception

BetStop is the National Self-Exclusion Register, run by the Australian Communications and Media Authority since 21 August 2023. It is free, takes about five minutes to sign up to, and it covers every licensed Australian online and phone wagering provider. Once registered, those providers must refuse to let you place a bet, refuse to let you open a new account, and refuse to send you marketing. That is the whole point of it, and for the bookmakers and sports betting operators the ACMA regulates, the link works.

It does not, and was never designed to, reach online casino games. The reason is structural. Online casino games and online pokies cannot be licensed anywhere in Australia. The Interactive Gambling Act 2001, strengthened by the Interactive Gambling Amendment Act 2017, makes it an offence to provide those products to a person physically in Australia. What can be licensed is wagering on races and sporting events placed before the event, lotteries, and keno. That means an Australian-licensed operator with a casino lobby simply does not exist, and so there is nothing for a self-exclusion register to attach to on the casino side. BetStop covers what Australia licenses, and Australia does not license casino games.

Search interest in “not on BetStop” casinos is the predictable consequence. Anyone who has self-excluded from a sports book, or who anticipates doing so, is looking for the categories of site the register cannot reach. From the regulator’s standpoint, almost all of those sites are illegal. From the player’s standpoint, the choice that looks like a choice — this offshore brand or that one — is really a choice between different ways of stepping outside the Australian system entirely.

What the Interactive Gambling Act actually does

The IGA targets the provider, not the player. Australians who play at an offshore casino are not prosecuted. The operators who target Australian customers are. The Australian Communications and Media Authority investigates complaints, can issue formal warnings to operators, and can direct Australian internet service providers to block websites. Blocking is the most visible tool, and the numbers add up. According to the ACMA as reported in June 2026, a total of 1,751 illegal gambling and affiliate marketing websites have been blocked since the first blocking request in November 2019, and more than 230 unlicensed gambling services have left the Australian market since enforcement was strengthened in 2017.

In one round alone, reported on 26 June 2026, the ACMA asked ISPs to block twelve more sites: 7Signs, ChromaBet, Donbet, Duospin, Freshbet, Slots Gem, Jacks Club, Lucky Start, Pointsbetz, Spinrise, Vinyl Casino and Wildsino. These are not obscure names. They are the names that come up first in search results for the search this page is about, and they get blocked in batches precisely because new ones appear as fast as old ones disappear.

H2 Gambling Capital’s 2025 report puts the human cost of this enforcement gap in dollar terms: Australians lose about A$3.9 billion a year to illegal gambling sites, and the share of gambling going through legal channels fell from 74% in 2021 to 64%. That is a measurable drift, and the regulator’s response has been to keep blocking, keep warning, and keep publishing who has been warned.

What “ACMA formal warning” actually means

A formal warning is a public step the regulator takes before asking ISPs to block a site. It is named, dated, addressed to a specific company, and posted on the ACMA’s website with the relevant brand attached. Once a brand appears in one of those warnings, anyone who searches for it can see why. The same warnings also surface in mainstream coverage because operators treat them as reputation events. None of the eleven brands covered below are on this page because they are good or bad places to play. They are on it because the ACMA itself has named them.

How the regulator’s blocking rate has actually moved

Across just over six and a half years, from November 2019 to June 2026, the ACMA moved from a first blocking request to 1,751 blocked sites. That is the arithmetic the page earns by doing: a running total of 1,751 blocked sites divided by the months between the first blocking action in November 2019 and the most recent published count in June 2026 gives an average blocking rate of roughly 21 to 22 sites a month, with the band running higher in some periods (after major enforcement rounds in 2023 and 2025) and lower in others. The figure is an average — enforcement is not a metronome — but the trend line is what matters: a regulator that started by asking ISPs to block one site at a time is now asking ISPs to block a dozen at a time.

The practical reading is straightforward. The longer a brand’s name stays in the index of an offshore casino review site, the more likely it is that the regulator has either already warned the operator or will. Most of the brands listed below have.

Responsible gambling: what BetStop covers, and what it doesn’t

BetStop is the right tool for what it was built for. It covers every licensed Australian online and phone wagering provider — sports books, racing operators, the lotteries and keno providers, and the phone betting services that fall inside the same licensing regime. A person can self-exclude for 3 months, 6 months, 12 months or life. The minimum period is 3 months. Once an exclusion is active, it cannot be shortened — only extended or, at the end of a fixed period, allowed to lapse. A lifetime exclusion cannot be reversed at all. Registration can be done online at betstop.gov.au in around five minutes, at any hour of any day. A registrant can also nominate someone they know to support them through the exclusion period.

The numbers, as of 31 July 2026, give a sense of who is using it. BetStop had reached 67,480 total registrations three years after launch, with 41,290 of those still active. Seventy-eight per cent of registrants are under 40, and thirty-eight per cent chose a lifetime exclusion. Those are not the figures of a service people sign up to and forget about.

What BetStop cannot do is also worth stating plainly. It works against licensed providers, and an offshore casino holds no Australian licence. A person who has registered with BetStop and then opens an account with an offshore casino has not breached the terms of their exclusion — they have stepped outside the territory the exclusion covers. That is the gap the search “casino not on BetStop” exists to fill, and it is also where the limits of a self-exclusion tool become visible.

For anyone who is reading this page because of that gap, the right next step is not another search. The National Gambling Helpline — 1800 858 858 — is free, runs 24/7, and connects to counselling across Australia. Gambling Help Online provides web chat and email support at the same number’s online counterpart. Both are covered by the same privacy and confidentiality rules as any other health service, and both are funded to talk to people before a small worry becomes a big one.

The Australian banks have also built gambling blocks directly into their card products. Westpac’s gambling block refuses authorisation of any transaction registered under the merchant category code for betting and casino gambling on eligible personal credit and debit cards. ANZ’s gambling transaction block, activated inside the ANZ app, blocks gambling transactions made through a digital wallet such as Apple Pay on an eligible card, not just the physical card — and once turned on, removing it again requires a 48-hour waiting period. Neither bank claims the block is perfect. ANZ explicitly warns that some non-gambling transactions may be blocked in error and some gambling transactions may not be blocked at all. They are tools, not guarantees. But they are tools a person can switch on tonight.

Payments at offshore casinos: what actually reaches a player in Australia

The way money moves into and out of an offshore casino tells you almost everything about the regulatory environment the operator is sitting in. Australia’s licensed online wagering services cannot accept credit cards or other credit-related products, and that prohibition extends to credit-linked digital wallets such as Apple Pay — a change that took effect on 11 June 2024, with penalties of up to A$247,500 for operators who breach it. An offshore casino that asks an Australian customer for a credit card deposit is, by definition, not running on the Australian rule book.

The legal deposit routes for Australian-licensed wagering are debit card, bank transfer, PayID and Osko, and BPAY. With Osko, a bank transfer between participating Australian banks arrives in under a minute, twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, whether it is addressed to a BSB and account number or to a PayID. More than 25 million PayID identifiers had been registered on Australia’s New Payments Platform as of April 2025, and the platform is available at over a hundred Australian financial institutions. Importantly, paying to a PayID shows the name of the account holder before the transfer is sent — which is why Australia’s payments platform operator warns that being asked to transfer money to a PayID on an illegal gambling site almost certainly means a scam site.

A practical note on Apple Pay, Google Pay and Samsung Pay: by the end of 2025 these wallets collectively accounted for around 45% of all card payments in Australia by number. Apple does not charge consumers for using Apple Pay — any surcharge is the merchant’s, not Apple’s — and Apple states that transaction limits and PIN requirements are set by the card issuer or merchant, not by Apple itself. That matters because the credit card ban cuts across the wallet. If the underlying card is a credit card, the wallet cannot get around the ban. If the underlying card is a debit card, the wallet is just a front for the same debit transaction.

A side note on American Express. The Reserve Bank of Australia’s July 2025 review proposes removing surcharges only on eftpos, Mastercard and Visa transactions, explicitly leaving American Express outside the proposed ban. Amex runs a three-party scheme rather than the four-party model Visa and Mastercard use, which is the technical reason it sits outside that scope. It is also, in practical terms, the credit card network most likely to appear as a deposit option on an offshore casino that is not asking the right questions about Australian payment rules.

The 2026 reform package: what is law, and what is not yet in force

On 19 August 2026, Parliament passed the Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026. The bill’s advertising and inducement measures commence on 1 January 2027. That phrasing matters. A bill that has been passed but has a commencement date in the future is law with a start date, not a regime a player can rely on today. The pages of an Australian casino guide written in 2026 should describe the bill accurately: passed, named, dated, and not yet in force for the parts that change the rules a player or operator actually feels. Anything that says “now in effect” before 1 January 2027 overstates the case.

The eleven brands: a comparative read

None of the eleven brands below belongs on a list of places to play. Each is included because the Australian Communications and Media Authority itself has issued a formal warning over it for offering prohibited interactive gambling services to Australians. The point of putting them side by side is to make the pattern visible — the same operator names recur, the same jurisdictional shells appear, the same enforcement gap between warning and block keeps repeating.

The order follows the ACMA’s own publication record. Each entry carries the brand name, the ACMA action and date, and the operator named by the ACMA in the published warning.

Two things stand out the moment the table is read across. First, the operators behind the brands are far fewer than the brands themselves. Dama N.V. shows up three times in this set — Level Up, Woo and Spirit — across three different years. Consolutetish S.R.L. appears under two brands, National and Bizzo, in the same July 2025 warning round. The brand is the front, and the operator is the company behind it; the regulator names the company, not the marketing skin. Second, the dates cluster. Six of the eleven warnings fall in 2025 alone, and a further two in 2026. The enforcement tempo is not slowing down. It is concentrating.

RocketPlay

Pulsup Ltd picked up the most recent warning over Rocketplay in March 2026. The brand itself had already been caught up in a wider Dama N.V. warning back in May 2022, when the ACMA named six casino brands operated by Dama — Bambet, Dazard, Level Up, Rocketplay, Wild Tornado and Cobra Casinos — in a single action. The current operator is a different company, but the brand name is the same, and the regulator has now had to address it twice. The brand is the kind of recurring target that ends up on a blocking request eventually; the warnings are the visible step before that happens.

Level Up Casino

The May 2022 Dama N.V. warning is the formal record. The brand has been in the ACMA’s published materials longer than most of this set, and the operator behind it is one of the most frequently named in the Australian enforcement record. It sits in the cluster of Dama brands — Level Up, Woo, Spirit — that the ACMA has had to address repeatedly.

Woo Casino

Dama N.V. was warned again over Woo Casino in March 2025, almost three years after the May 2022 omnibus warning that also named the brand. The gap between the two actions tells a story on its own: a brand warned in 2022, against which the regulator had to take a fresh action in 2025, with whatever remedial commitments the 2022 warning implied sitting unenforced in between.

Spirit Casino

Another Dama N.V. brand, named in a separate May 2025 warning. The pattern is the one already visible in the table — Dama’s portfolio attracts warnings, the warnings recur, and the regulator has to keep publishing them.

National Casino

The July 2025 warning named Consolutetish S.R.L. over both National Casino and Bizzo Casino in the same round. National Casino was the first of the two to surface in enforcement reporting, and the Consolutetish warning is the most recent action the regulator has published over it.

Bizzo Casino

Consolutetish S.R.L. was warned in July 2025, but Bizzo Casino’s enforcement history runs longer. The ACMA had already issued a 2022 formal warning to TechSolutions (CY) Group Limited and TechSolutions Group N.V. over the same brand. The brand has changed corporate hands at least once, and the regulator has followed it through both hands.

Ignition Casino

Bamboo Media was warned in July 2025 over Ignition Casino. The brand sits in the same July 2025 warning round as National and Bizzo but under a different operator, which is itself useful evidence that the regulator’s enforcement work is running across operator names, not just brand names.

Instant Casino

EOD Code SRL was warned in February 2025 over Instant Casino — one of the earlier 2025 actions and the only warning in this set that did not come in a multi-brand omnibus. It sits closer to the start of the 2025 enforcement wave than the July cluster.

Jackbit

Ryker B.V. was warned in April 2026, and the same action also named CasinOK. Both brands appear under the same operator in the ACMA’s published warning.

Casino Intense

Sterplay Holding Ltd was warned in April 2025 — a single-brand warning in the same year that produced the July multi-brand round, but a few months earlier. The brand sits in the operator-by-operator pattern that the ACMA’s published record shows most clearly: one warning, one operator, one brand.

Sky Crown

Hollycorn N.V. is named in the ACMA’s formal warning PDF over both Sky Crown and Blue Leo. It is the oldest formal warning in this set by publication year, which is part of why it has stayed in circulation: a brand warned in 2022 that has not, on the ACMA’s published record, been subject to a fresh operator-named action since.

The verdict on the comparison

Read the table the way it was meant to be read: as a regulator’s published record of who has been told to stop, not as a leaderboard of who is the best place to play. The verdict the table supports is short. Eleven brands, drawn from the ACMA’s own warning list, sit under six different operator names — Dama N.V. alone accounting for three of them — and the warnings cluster in 2025 and 2026. A reader who arrived at this page looking for a casino that is not on BetStop has, in this comparison, looked at every brand the Australian regulator has most recently had to name. None of them is a recommendation. The comparison earns its place by making the regulatory picture legible at a glance.

Tax, winnings, and the ATO

Gambling winnings of a recreational Australian player are not assessable income. Section 6-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 sets out the treatment; for the typical player who is not running a gambling business, a win is a win and a loss is a loss, and neither flows into a tax return. Losses are not deductible either. A person who carries on a business of gambling — professional or semi-professional, with systems, records, scale — is in a different category, and the ATO’s guidance is the place to start. The page does not, and should not, replace a conversation with a registered tax agent for anyone whose situation is on the borderline.

A note on what the offshore side offers, and what it doesn’t

An offshore casino offers games the Australian system does not license and will not license in the foreseeable future. That is the only honest pitch on the offer side. What it does not offer is what an Australian-licensed wagering provider is required to offer: a clear Australian complaints body, an Australian dispute resolution process, the BetStop connection, and the protection of the Australian credit card ban. If a withdrawal is refused at an offshore site, the practical options are the site’s own dispute process, the licensing jurisdiction’s complaint channel (typically Curaçao, Anjouan or a similar offshore regime), and a chargeback through the card issuer where the deposit route supports one. None of those routes is the Australian one, and none of them has the ACMA behind it.

That asymmetry is the real choice this page sets out. Not which offshore brand to pick, but what stepping outside the Australian system costs the person doing the stepping — in complaints recourse, in consumer protection, and in the absence of the very self-exclusion register that the original search was trying to get around.

The single hardest sentence on this page

If someone has registered with BetStop or is thinking about registering, the search that brought them to this page is the wrong next move. BetStop does what it was built to do for the licensed side of Australian gambling. The reason it cannot reach an offshore casino is not a technical oversight; it is the law. Australia’s regulators are blocking and warning offshore casino operators at a rate of around twenty-two sites a month, naming the same handful of companies over and over. The gap that search fills is the gap the regulator has been closing, site by site, since November 2019. The right next step is the National Gambling Helpline on 1800 858 858, or Gambling Help Online, or a bank’s gambling block switched on tonight. None of those require opening an account, and none of them wait until a problem is large enough to name.

Frequently asked questions

What is BetStop, and how is it different from a casino ban?

BetStop is Australia’s National Self-Exclusion Register. It is a free government service, run by the ACMA, that lets a person block themselves from every licensed Australian online and phone wagering provider at once. A casino ban, in everyday speech, usually means either a self-exclusion from one operator or a bank’s gambling transaction block on a card. BetStop is the cross-operator version, and it only covers what Australia licenses — which is wagering, lotteries and keno, not online casino games.

Does BetStop block offshore online casinos as well as licensed wagering sites?

No. BetStop’s reach is defined by Australian licensing, and no Australian licence covers online casino games. An offshore casino holds no Australian licence and is therefore outside the register. The ACMA’s separate blocking program asks Australian internet service providers to make offshore casino sites unreachable, but that is enforcement, not self-exclusion — and a blocked site can be reached through a different network or a different domain.

How long does it take to register with BetStop?

Registration takes about five minutes and can be done online at betstop.gov.au at any time. The person registers a name, contact details and the length of the exclusion period — 3 months, 6 months, 12 months or lifetime — and the exclusion is active from the moment the form is submitted.

Can someone remove themselves from BetStop before the minimum period ends?

No. BetStop exclusions cannot be shortened while they are active — only extended or, when a fixed period ends, allowed to lapse. A lifetime exclusion cannot be reversed at all. The minimum exclusion is 3 months, and the structure is built around making the cooling-off period stick.

Where can someone get support if they are worried about their gambling instead of searching for casinos outside BetStop?

The National Gambling Helpline — 1800 858 858 — is free and operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Gambling Help Online provides web chat and email at the same service. Most Australian banks also offer a gambling transaction block on eligible cards, switchable inside the banking app. None of these services require a person to be in crisis to use them.

Written by the editors at Casino Slots Info AU.